PROBLEM: Monitoring mats made from electrospun fibers change as fibers swell, foul, or are regenerated, and those changes alter electron-transfer conditions behind each reading. A compliance record that stores only concentrations cannot show whether a trend came from the environment or from mat ageing. Monitoring programmes need a shared proposal space where fiber history and transfer conditions stay attached to the data they produce.
SOLUTION: IBM Cloud Ideas would host proposals for electrospun monitoring mats that include spinning conditions, biosorbent loading, DFT binding predictions, Marcus windows, and regeneration logs with each idea. Contributors could compare water-based fiber variants and require energy-budget and reuse accounting before an idea is marked test-ready. The shared record would make mat lineage visible to anyone reviewing a monitoring trend.
EVIDENCE BASIS: Marcus electron transfer — rate depends on reorganization energy and driving force; inverted region; Nobel 1992. DFT via Kohn–Sham equations; Hohenberg–Kohn 1964, Kohn–Sham 1965, Nobel 1998. Biosorption batch isotherms and Langmuir/Freundlich models are textbook DOCUMENTED. Source: Nobel Prize records (1992, 1998); standard adsorption textbooks.
| Idea priority | Low |
| Needed By | Not sure -- Just thought it was cool |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.